Forgery Trial: Why Court Adjourned Saraki, Ekweremadu Case

saraki-ekweremaduJustice Yusuf Halilu of the Abuja High Court at Apo, on Monday, fixed September 28 for the Federal Government to open its case against the Senate President, Dr. Bukola Saraki and his deputy, Ike Ekweremadu. The duo are facing trial over their alleged involvement in the forgery of Senate Standing Rules, 2015.

Also charged before the court over the alleged forgery were the former Clerk of the National Assembly, Alhaji Salisu Abubakar Maikasuwa and his deputy, Mr. Benedict Efeturi. The defendants were alleged to have masterminded the usage of the said bogus Standing Rules for the June 9, 2015, election, through which both Saraki and Ekweremadu took over the leadership of the Senate.

FG, in the two-count charge marked CR/219/16, maintained that the defendants, by their conduct, committed an offence punishable under Section 97 (1) and 364 of the Penal Code Act. Trial Justice Halilu had on June 27 released the defendants on bail, even as he okayed full-blown hearing into the matter.

However, the case could not proceed as scheduled on Monday owing to the fact that the court has commenced its annual vacation. Consequently, trial of the defendants was differed till September 28. Meanwhile, FG has engaged a private prosecutor to conduct the trial on its behalf.

ALSO READ: NBA: Tim Duncan Announces Retirement

The case which was hitherto handled by the Director of Public Prosecution, DPP, Mr. Mohammed Diri, has now been assigned to the former Attorney-General and Commissioner of Justice of Kano State, Aliyu Umar, SAN. Diri had on the day the defendants were arraigned, told the court that he would not oppose Saraki’s bail request. He however urged the court to deny the trio of Ekweremadu, Maikasuwa and Efeturi bail on the premise that they attempted to evade service of the charge on them.

Diri said his decision not to challenge Saraki’s bail application was to ensure that legislative business in the Senate was not hampered in any way. In a bench ruling, Justice Halilu allowed the defendants to go home after they produced “two reasonable sureties” each. The court however stressed that the sureties must be owners of landed properties in the highbrow areas of Asokoro, Maitama, Wuse II or Garki in Abuja.

Previous ArticleNext Article
Arinze Esomnofu is a Content writer with He is not only talented but also passionate about writing and reporting as he has had some of his op-ed article featured in top Nigerian Online and Traditional media houses. He is also a freethinker on religious matters.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *